Understanding which standards genuinely reflect how vacuum units perform is vital for choosing the right high performance glazing. Vacuum insulated […]
Understanding which standards genuinely reflect how vacuum units perform is vital for choosing the right high performance glazing.
Vacuum insulated glazing (VIG) is a remarkable technology, delivering exceptional thermal efficiency in a slim profile ideal for heritage buildings and modern retrofits. However, when it comes to testing and verifying performance, not all standards are created equal. One of the most common misunderstandings in the market is the use of EN 673 to present U-values for vacuum glazing. While EN 673 is a well-established standard for standard insulating glass units, it is not suitable for vacuum glazing and can give an unrealistic picture of performance.
EN 673 supports gas-filled double and triple glazing. It calculates U-values based on assumptions that include:
Vacuum glazing breaks every one of these assumptions.
More importantly, EN 673 excludes the two largest sources of heat transfer in vacuum units:
Vacuum glazing uses a rigid perimeter seal, not a gas-filled IGU spacer. As a result, it behaves differently and contributes significantly to thermal bridging. EN 673 cannot model this behaviour, so it cannot include its effect.
VIG units rely on microscopic support pillars to stop the panes collapsing under atmospheric pressure. These pillars conduct heat directly between panes. Therefore, they have a major impact on performance. However, EN 673 does not account for them in its calculations.
Because EN 673 ignores the defining heat-loss pathways in vacuum glazing, it cannot produce reliable results. So, when someone presents a VIG U-value calculated with EN 673, the figure may look optimistic. Yet it may also mislead, oversimplify, or fail to reflect real-world performance.
EN 674 measures heat transfer using a physical heat-flow meter. This matters because it tests actual performance, not simulated conditions. Crucially, VIG demands real measurement, not theoretical modelling.
EN 674 works because:
For these reasons, most leading laboratories and VIG researchers rely on EN 674 when they test vacuum glazing performance.

When you compare vacuum glazing options, ask these core questions:
Then, take one final step. Confirm that the tested sample matches the product supplied. Often, manufacturers change pillar spacing, edge seals, or layouts, yet they fail to update test evidence. So, always check the test report reflects the exact unit you will receive.
These steps help you avoid unrealistic claims and identify genuinely high-performing products.
People frequently specify vacuum glazing for:
In these contexts, accuracy is critical. Wrong assumptions lead to wrong calculations. In turn, this can affect predicted heat loss, design decisions, planning consent, long-term performance, and even warranties. When projects depend on precision, the margin for error disappears quickly.
To compare vacuum glazing products with confidence, trust EN 674. It measures real performance, reflects real physics, and accounts for the features that define VIG technology. Ultimately, it gives specifiers, manufacturers, consultants, and building owners the clarity they need to compare products fairly and make sound decisions.
Want help verifying real VIG performance for your project? Let’s talk standards, data, and tested results: