Fineo Glass vs LandVac Vacuum Glazing
Discover the pros and cons of LandVac and Fineo Glass, two leading manufacturers of vacuum glazing. Compare thermal performance, soundproofing, durability, pricing, and more. Make an informed decision for your glazing needs.
LandVac Vacuum Glazing vs. Fineo Glass: A Comprehensive Comparison
In the evolving world of glazing solutions, LandVac Vacuum Glazing and Fineo have emerged as leading contenders, offering exceptional performance and energy efficiency. As discerning customers seek the best options for their windows, it becomes crucial to conduct an objective and impartial analysis of these two products. This post aims to provide an in-depth comparison of LandVac Vacuum Glazing and Fineo Glass, exploring their performance statistics, pros, and cons. By delving into their thermal performance, soundproof capabilities, condensation control, and overall durability, readers can gain valuable insights to make informed decisions for their specific projects. So, let’s dive into this comprehensive examination to uncover the similarities, differences, and unique features of LandVac and Fineo, empowering you to elevate your window offerings and meet the diverse needs of your customers.
I. Performance Comparison:
A. Thermal Performance:
When it comes to thermal performance, both LandVac Vacuum Glazing and Fineo excel in minimising heat transfer and maximising energy efficiency. Let’s take a closer look at their U-value and thermal insulation capabilities:
1. LandVac Vacuum Glazing:
– LandVac boasts an impressive U-value of 0.4 W/m²K. Its vacuum-sealed design eliminates air convection, reducing heat loss and ensuring superior insulation.
– With LandVac, buildings can achieve exceptional energy savings by significantly reducing heat transfer through windows, resulting in improved thermal comfort and reduced heating costs.
2. Fineo:
– Fineo is known for its outstanding thermal insulation properties, offering U-values as low as 0.7 W/m²K. Its advanced thin-film coating technology and multiple low-emissivity layers help minimise heat transfer, ensuring efficient energy performance.
– By incorporating Fineo into their projects, users can enhance the energy efficiency of their windows, leading to reduced energy consumption and a more sustainable living environment.
| Performance Factor | Fineo | LandVac |
|---|---|---|
| U-Value | 0.7 W/m²K | 0.4 W/m²K |
| Thermal Insulation | Very Good | Excellent |
| Energy Efficiency | Efficient | High |
| Heat Transfer Reduction | Minimised | Significant |
Comparing the thermal performance of LandVac and Fineo, both solutions provide excellent insulation and contribute to overall energy savings. The specific choice between the two may depend on project requirements, desired U-value, and regional climate conditions. Next, we will delve into other aspects of their performance to provide a comprehensive comparison.
B. Soundproof Performance:
When it comes to creating a quieter indoor environment, both LandVac Vacuum Glazing and Fineo offer sound reduction capabilities. Let’s compare their acoustic reduction (RW) ratings and analyse their performance in mitigating external noise.
| Product | Acoustic Reduction (RW) |
|---|---|
| LandVac Optimum | 41dB |
| LandVac Heritage | 39dB |
| Fineo | 35dB |
LandVac offer a wide range of configurations with the options to achieve a variety of G values based on your requirements. LandVac Optimum, with a configuration of 4TL (D80) + 0.3V + 4TL (D80) + 9Ar + 3 + 0.76P + 3, achieves a G value of 0.32. This indicates efficient solar heat control, limiting the amount of heat transmitted into the building. LandVac Heritage with a solar control would achieve 0.33.
Fineo, on the other hand, has a higher G value of 0.87, indicating higher solar heat gain compared to LandVac Vacuum Glazing. This means that Fineo allows more solar radiation to enter the building, which may result in increased heat accumulation.
It’s important to consider the specific requirements of the project, local climate conditions, and desired energy efficiency goals when selecting the appropriate glazing solution. Consulting with manufacturers and reviewing detailed technical specifications would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the G values and their implications in different scenarios.
D. Plugs, Getters, and Micro Pillars:
When evaluating vacuum glazing options, the presence of plugs, getters, and micro pillars can impact both performance and visibility. Let’s compare LandVac Vacuum Glazing and Fineo in terms of these elements.
| Feature | LandVac Vacuum Glazing | Fineo |
|---|---|---|
| Plugs and Getters | Visible, but generally hidden by the frame | Not visible |
| Micro Pillars | 267 dots per square metre | 2,774 dots per square metre |
| Visibility | Translucent grey, almost entirely invisible | Potentially visible with higher density |
LandVac Vacuum Glazing incorporates visible plugs and getters, although they are typically concealed by the frame upon installation. These elements are strategically positioned to enhance the durability and performance of the glazing. Additionally, LandVac features 267 micro pillars per square meter. These dots are translucent grey and nearly invisible from a standard viewing distance, ensuring minimal obstruction to visibility.
In contrast, Fineo does not have visible plugs or getters, resulting in a cleaner appearance. It features a linear getter in the edge zone of the vacuum cavity, contributing to its performance. Fineo also has a higher density of micro pillars, with 2,774 dots per square meter. While this increased density may offer structural strength, it can potentially affect visibility, particularly in certain lighting conditions.
The visibility of plugs, getters, and micro pillars can be a subjective consideration, as it depends on individual preferences and project requirements. It’s essential to consult with manufacturers and assess the technical specifications of each product to make an informed decision based on specific needs.
E. Durability and Lifespan:
The durability and lifespan of vacuum glazing play a crucial role in the long-term performance and value of the product. Let’s compare LandVac Vacuum Glazing and Fineo in terms of their durability and expected lifespan.
1. Toughened Glass:
LandVac Vacuum Glazing comes with toughened glass as a standard feature. This toughening process enhances the strength and resistance of the glass, making it more durable and less prone to breakage. On the other hand, Fineo offers the option to specify toughened glass at an additional cost, providing an extra layer of strength and security.
2. Guarantee and Expected Lifespan:
Both LandVac and Fineo offer a 15-year guarantee, which provides assurance for their performance and quality. Additionally, these vacuum glazing solutions are designed to have an expected lifespan of 25 years or more, ensuring long-term durability and reliability.
By incorporating toughened glass as a standard feature, LandVac Vacuum Glazing offers enhanced durability and strength right from the start. Fineo provides the flexibility to choose toughened glass as an added option, allowing customers to tailor their glazing solution based on specific project requirements.
Both LandVac and Fineo are backed by a 15-year guarantee, demonstrating the manufacturers’ confidence in the quality and performance of their products. With an expected lifespan of 25 years or more, these vacuum glazing solutions are designed to provide reliable and durable performance over an extended period.
It’s essential to consider the specific needs of the project, including budget, desired features, and performance requirements, when selecting a vacuum glazing solution that offers the optimal balance of durability and lifespan.
F. Price:
When it comes to price, both LandVac and Fineo vacuum glazing are similarly priced, depending on the chosen distributor. However, it’s important to note that LandVac includes toughened glass as a standard feature at this price point, while Fineo may require an additional cost for specifying toughened glass. Overall, LandVac tends to offer a slightly more cost-effective solution with the added benefit of toughened glass included.
Please note that pricing may vary based on specific distributors and regional factors. It is recommended to consult with distributors or manufacturers for accurate and up-to-date pricing information.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, both LandVac and Fineo offer advanced vacuum glazing solutions with their own unique features and benefits. Let’s summarise the pros and cons of each manufacturer:
Pros:
- Superior thermal performance with low U-values and excellent insulation capabilities.
- Soundproofing capabilities with high acoustic reduction ratings.
- Low number of micro pillars or dots.
- Toughened glass included as a standard feature, ensuring durability and safety.
- Cost-effective pricing, offering value for money.
Cons:
- Visible plug and getter.
Pros:
- High visible light transmittance, allowing ample natural light into the space.
- No visible plugs or getters, providing a clear view through the glazing.
Cons:
- Lower thermal performance compared to LandVac in terms of U-values and insulation.
- Additional cost for specifying toughened glass, impacting overall price.
- Large number of micro pillars could distort visibility.
It’s important to consider the specific requirements of your project and weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each manufacturer’s offering. Consulting with distributors or manufacturers can provide further guidance in choosing the most suitable vacuum glazing solution for your needs.
Compare LandVac Optimum and Heritage vacuum Glazing.
Find out more about Fineo Glass.
Disclaimer: The information, figures, and comparisons provided in this piece are sourced from the manufacturers’ websites and were accurate at the time of writing. It is advisable to verify the current information directly from the manufacturers or authorised distributors.